|
7 Winthrop Street Essex, Massachusetts 01929-1203 Tel: (978)768-6610 Fax: (978)768-6570 E-Mail: dpd@certworthy.com |
|
Mr. Derrick prepared
the following samples of his work product using Wordperfect software. When
written, each petition or brief conformed with the applicable Court rules and
was appropriately formatted for reproduction and timely filing by a printer
chosen after collaboration with the client. Conversion of this material to HTML
for this web site had modified the format and affected some formerly italicized
case names. However, the full text of each petition and brief remains intact;
one petition has been abridged for use here. Copies of any petition or brief as
filed with the Court are available upon request. Houlton Band of the Maliseet Indians v. Ryan et al., U.S. Supreme Court No. 07-___(pending). Aroostoock Band of the Micmacs v. Ryan et al., U.S. Supreme Court No. 07-___(pending). Elaine Boyd v. Roy Wisdom, U.S. Supreme Court No. 05-603. (settled in petitioner's favor after petition for certiorari filed in U.S. Supreme Court) Bank of Louisiana v. Craig's Stores of Texas, Inc., U.S. Supreme Court No. 05-144. City of Fairfield, Ohio v. Tucker et al., U.S. Supreme Court No. 05-153. Stevens Creek Quarry, Incorporated v. Santa Clara County Commission et al., U.S. Supreme Court No. 00-491.(Amicus Curiae Brief). Ross v. State Contracting and Engineering, U.S. Supreme Court No. 06-1075. Alpha Communications, Inc. v. IBM, U.S. Supreme Court No. 06-___. Sampson v. Sampson, 62 Mass. App. Ct. 366 (2004). Lord v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 60 Mass. App. Ct. 309 (2004). Blackstone v. Cashman, A.C. No. 2003-P-1512. Kitras v. Town of Aquinnah, A.C. No. 2004-P-472. Healy v. Lockwood, A.C. No. 2004-P-558. Danger Records v. Berger, 61 Mass. App. Ct. 1110 (2004). Greenwood v. Town of Easton, A.C. No. 2003-P-930. |
||
| Please Note A Petition for Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court must be filed within ninety (90) days of the entry of a final judgment or the denial of a motion for reconsideration by a state's highest court or a federal appellate court. If your claim of a federal or constitutional deprivation deserves review by the U.S. Supreme Court and is therefore "certworthy," it is vital that there be sufficient time to prepare a persuasive written argument in support of your position. There is no charge or cost to inquire. "Equal Justice Under Law" |
||
This web site may constitute "advertising" under Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Rule 3:07. The material contained on this web site has been prepared for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice. This web site was developed by the Social Law Library of Boston, Massachusetts. Click here to see the site terms of use. |
||